EMFs: The Health Danger Hiding in Plain Sight Part 2

EMFs: The Health Danger Hiding in Plain Sight Part 2

By Lindsay Christensen

Nutritionist @ The Pratt Clinics

3/7/2019

In Part 1 of this blog series, I explained what electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are and the four types of EMFs that can adversely affect your health. In this blog, I’ll discuss the major problems with our current EMF safety standards. 

Are EMFs safe? 

Whether or not man-made EMFs are safe has been the subject of much debate and controversy over the years. While most physicists, engineers, policy makers, and politicians don’t believe that man-made EMFs cause harm to the body, many outspoken scientists and physicians, as well as a rapidly-growing body of scientific research, suggest otherwise.

People who are doubtful of the harmful effects of man-made EMFs cite studies showing no evidence of harm from EMFs, while conveniently ignoring those that do. Interestingly, most of the studies showing no evidence of harm have been funded by the telecommunications industry, the very industry that wants to increase your use of EMF-emitting devices, not scare you away from them! Conversely, a quick perusal of the non-industry funded literature yields a very different result – man-made EMFs do indeed interact with the human body and can potentially cause some serious health problems. 

Safety standards for EMFs are hopelessly outdated

You may be wondering, aren’t there safety standards for EMF-emitting devices? While the answer is “yes,” these safety standards are extremely outdated – they were last updated in 1996 and thus do not reflect (or protect us from) the level of EMFs to which we are exposed today. The claim that an electronic device “meets government standards” or that radiation levels emitted from a device are “FCC compliant” essentially means nothing and gives a false impression of safety. 

This may come as a surprise, but long-term safety testing of EMF-emitting devices has never been carried out. By just living in our current EMF-inundated environment, we are participating every day in a massive experiment assessing the long-term safety effects of EMFs. Unfortunately, the results of this “study” are not looking very positive. 

Shockingly, regulatory agencies aren’t held accountable for any harm caused by EMFs. According to the 1996 Telecommunications Act (the same one that continues to provide us with outdated safety information) telecommunications companies are not responsible for any harm caused by cell phone antennas, towers, cell phones, or other electronic devices, even if irrefutable evidence indicates that these structures and devices cause harm! This act was made possible by a whopping $50 billion in lobbying from the telecommunications industry; does this seem like a massive conflict of interest to you? It sure does to me! 

While multiple government agencies have called for reassessments of these outdated safety standards, their concerns have primarily remained ignored. (1, 2, 3) However, people must continue to speak out – if enough voices are heard, perhaps the telecommunications industry will change its ways a put effort into producing safer technological devices. 

The secret in the fine print of your cell phone

If you navigate to “Settings” on your smartphone, you should be able to find a legal disclaimer reminding you to never hold the phone against your head or any part of your body. Clearly, we all follow this advice, right? Unfortunately, cell phone safety instructions remain conveniently hidden by manufacturers and unnoticed by most cell phone users. Yet, even these recommendations, referred to as SAR (specific absorption rate) guidelines, are outdated! 

The method used to assess the “safety” of cell phones involves applying cell phone radiation to the head of a dummy. The dummy’s head contains a mixture of water, salt, and sugar designed to reflect the absorptive capacity of the human brain. Importantly, the dummy used in these tests is the size of a 6’2”, 220 lb man; the testing scenario for cell phones, therefore, does not reflect the relative safety of cell phone radiation for smaller individuals, who absorb exponentially more radiation.

Furthermore, in this testing scenario, the dummy’s “brain” is exposed to cell phone radiation for a mere 6 minutes. Most people carry their cell phones on their bodies all day, meaning most of us are likely greatly exceeding SAR guidelines.  

Finally, the current testing protocol for cell phones looks solely at how much the radiation from the phone heats up the brain; it does not assess the biological effects of non-ionizing radiation. EMF safety standards for cell phones are, therefore, not reflective of the actual risk these devices pose to our health. This is a problem that should greatly concern us all. 

I hope this post has helped you better understand the safety concerns associated with man-made EMFs! Stay tuned for Part 3, in which I’ll discuss the many adverse health effects of man-made EMF exposure. Any questions? Conatct us at The Pratt Clinics.

Dr.Pratt is a great team player and her work complements the other therapies and approaches we follow in conjunction.

- Parent of Autism Spectral Disorder Patient

Apart from BIT, Dr.Pratt's vast knowledge of the biomedical basis of ASD helps support parents as they try to heal the child's body in helping the brain develop.

- Parent of Autism Spectral Disorder Patient

There were such significant changes in my child's behavior after Dr. Pratt’s treatment, that it absolutely changed his life and the whole family.

- Behavioral Issues and Family Naturopathic Care

I have to say, I have never seen anything have such a positive impact on someone's life.

- ADD / Memory Recall Patient

Dr. Pratt's approach was friendly, relaxing, reassuring and non-invasive, and the progress that we saw in our son's writing was immediate and remarkable.

- Specific Learning Disability Patient

I would highly recommend Dr. Pratt’s nurturing, life changing treatments to anyone who desires a better, easier way of living in this world.

- Anxiety / Learning Disability Patient

Dr. Pratt’s treatment made it possible for my daughter to go to school full-time for the first time in two years, and as a matter of fact, she’s now talking about going to college instead of worrying that she’d never graduate high school.


- Patient of Head Injury Patient

Since my first appointment with Dr. Pratt, I have come back to her for every ailment. She has quickly and effectively cured every sickness I have experienced.

- Naturopathic Medicine Patient

I am working 4 days a week and I accomplish more in a day now than I did in a whole week before. I feel productive and useful after BIT.

- Head Injury Patient

It has not all been easy, changing your lifestyle and diet is a challenge but we feel very supported by Dr. Pratt. It's a long road to recovery but the rewards are great along the way. My son has almost recovered from his symptoms and we owe all of this to Dr. Pratt. We are very thankful to have crossed her path at the right time in our journey.

- EI, Rye, NY

Dr. Pratt is compassionate and well-informed about the various challenges and available options for children with special needs. She is always willing to brainstorm options with parents and has a way of getting through to the children.

- Best, Pooja

It is almost impossible to explain the dramatic and positive effect Dr Shelese Pratt has had on my health. It is without exaggeration that I say Dr Pratt has saved my life on numerous occasions. To say her work has dramatically increased the quality of my life is gross understatement. There is not an aspect of my physical, mental, or emotional health that Dr Pratt has not addressed at some point during my years as her patient. I first saw Dr Pratt in 2005, after suffering one infection after another over the course of three months and had exhausted my known medial avenues. She was the only doctor to see the connection to between all of my symptoms and to care long enough and deep enough to get to the bottom of them. I have sent countless loved ones and colleagues to her over the years and know that the level of her care has changed their lives for better without exception. I have had the privilege of seeing Dr Pratt for Brain Integration, naturopathic, and homeopathic treatments and I can say without any reservation that I credit my health and well being to her and her practice.

- Erica A., Naturopathic Medicine Patient